Search Results
Showing results 1 to 5 of approximately 5.
(refine search)
Discussion Paper
Can Electric Cars Power China’s Growth?
China’s aggressive policies to develop its battery-powered electric vehicle (BEV) industry have been successful in making the country the dominant producer of these vehicles worldwide. Going forward, BEVs will likely claim a growing share of global motor vehicle sales, helped along by subsides and mandates implemented in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. Nevertheless, China’s success in selling BEVs may not contribute much to its GDP growth, owing both to the maturity of its motor vehicle sector and the strong tendency for countries to protect this high-profile industry.
Speech
Making globalization work: remarks at the Central Bank of Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil
Remarks at the Central Bank of Brazil, So Paulo, Brazil.
Speech
Benefits and challenges from globalization: remarks at the Bombay Stock Exchange, Mumbai, India
Remarks at the Bombay Stock Exchange, Mumbai, India.
Working Paper
Trade Liberalization versus Protectionism: Dynamic Welfare Asymmetries
We investigate whether the losses from an increase in trade costs (protectionism) are equal to the gains from a symmetric decrease in trade costs (liberalization). We incorporate dynamics through capital accumulation into a standard Armington trade model and show that the welfare changes are asymmetric: Losses from protectionism are smaller than the gains from liberalization. In contrast, standard static trade models imply that the losses equal the gains. The intuition for asymmetry in our model is that, following protectionism, the economy can coast off of previously accumulated capital ...
Working Paper
Trade Liberalization versus Protectionism: Dynamic Welfare Asymmetries
We investigate whether the losses from an increase in trade costs (protectionism) are equal to the gains from a symmetric decrease in trade costs (liberalization). We incorporate dynamics through capital accumulation into a multicountry trade model and show that the welfare changes are asymmetric: Losses from protectionism are smaller than the gains from liberalization. In contrast, standard static trade models imply that the losses equal the gains. The intuition for asymmetry in our model is that, following protectionism, the economy can coast on its previously accumulated capital stock, so ...