Search Results
Working Paper
Earnings Shocks and Stabilization During COVID-19
Larrimore, Jeff; Mortenson, Jacob; Splinter, David
(2021-08-02)
This paper documents the magnitude and distribution of U.S. earnings changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and how fiscal relief offset lost earnings. We build panels from administrative tax data to measure annual earnings changes. The frequency of earnings declines during the pandemic were similar to the Great Recession, but the distribution was very different. In 2020, workers starting in the bottom half of the distribution were more likely to experience large annual earnings declines and a similar share of male and female workers had large earnings declines. While most workers experiencing ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
, Paper 2021-052
Working Paper
Income in the Off-Season: Household Adaptation to Yearly Work Interruptions
Price, Brendan M.; Coglianese, John M.
(2020-10-07)
Joblessness is highly seasonal. To analyze how households adapt to seasonal joblessness, we introduce a measure of seasonal work interruptions premised on the idea that a seasonal worker will tend to exit employment around the same time each year. We show that an excess share of prime-age US workers experience recurrent separations spaced exactly 12 months apart. These separations coincide with aggregate seasonal downturns and are concentrated in seasonally volatile industries. Examining workers most prone to seasonal work interruptions, we find that these workers incur large earnings losses ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
, Paper 2020-084
Working Paper
How should unemployment benefits respond to the business cycle?
Kiley, Michael T.
(2003)
Unemployment insurance programs balance the benefits of consumption smoothing for unemployed workers against the disincentive effects of unemployment benefits. Such a balancing of benefits and costs is likely sensitive to the cyclical state of the economy, and hence the generosity of benefits should also respond to the cyclical state of the economy. The nature of such responses in an optimal unemployment insurance (UI) program is analyzed in a simple model. The results suggest that an optimal UI program would increase the initial level of benefits and probably extend higher benefits over time ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
, Paper 2003-01
Journal Article
If you lost your job …
Clement, Douglas
(2006-06)
Intuition and conventional economic models suggest that unemployment benefits should decline over time to induce unemployed workers to seek jobs.
The Region
, Volume 20
, Issue Jun
, Pages 34-37, 50-53
Working Paper
Universal Basic Income versus Unemployment Insurance
Pallage, Stéphane; Fabre, Alice; Zimmermann, Christian
(2014-11-14)
In this paper we compare the welfare effects of unemployment insurance (UI) with an universal basic income (UBI) system in an economy with idiosyncratic shocks to employment. Both policies provide a safety net in the face of idiosyncratic shocks. While the unemployment insurance program should do a better job at protecting the unemployed, it suffers from moral hazard and substantial monitoring costs, which may threaten its usefulness. The universal basic income, which is simpler to manage and immune to moral hazard, may represent an interesting alternative in this context. We work within a ...
Working Papers
, Paper 2014-47
Journal Article
Unemployment insurance policy in New England: background and issues
Tannenwald, Robert; O'Leary, Christopher J.
(1997-05)
Almost two-thirds of the states, and all the New England states except New Hampshire, have exhausted their unemployment insurance trust fund and borrowed from the federal government at least once during the past 35 years. Under such circumstances, states are required by law to raise unemployment insurance taxes in order to replenish their trust funds and to pay off their debts to the federal government. Since higher unemployment insurance taxes increase employer costs, replenishment forces states into a trade-off between economic competitiveness and trust fund adequacy. In recent years, ...
New England Economic Review
, Issue May
, Pages 3-22
Working Paper
Unemployment insurance and the uninsured
Regev, Tali
(2006)
Under federal-state law workers who quit a job are not entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits. To show how the existence of the uninsured affects wages and employment, I extend an equilibrium search model to account for two types of unemployed workers: those who are currently receiving unemployment benefits and for whom an increase in unemployment benefits reduces the incentive to work, and those who are currently not insured. For these, work provides an added value in the form of future eligibility, and an increase in unemployment benefits increases their willingness to work. ...
Working Paper Series
, Paper 2006-48
Working Paper
Unemployment Insurance Experience Rating and Labor Market Dynamics
Ratner, David
(2013-12-11)
Unemployment insurance experience rating imposes higher payroll tax rates on firms that have laid off more workers in the past. To analyze the effects of UI tax policy on labor market dynamics, this paper develops a search model of unemployment with heterogeneous firms and realistic UI financing. The model predicts that higher experience rating reduces both job creation and job destruction. Using firm-level data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, the model is tested by comparing job creation and job destruction across states and industries with different UI tax schedules. The ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
, Paper 2013-86
Working Paper
Expanding Unemployment Insurance Coverage
Michaud, Amanda M.
(2023-03-27)
This paper develops a quantitative framework to study the impact of Unemployment Insurance (UI) expansions to workers earning below eligibility thresholds. A model of how UI affects welfare and labor supply is developed and calibrated with microeconomic data, including consumption. The model predicts that the current ineligible would choose to stay on UI longer than the current eligible and the margins of why this is the case are quantified. The model is applied to the Great Recession by identifying ineligible workers in the data using machine learning and to an actual expansion during ...
Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers
, Paper 067
FILTER BY year
FILTER BY Bank
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 12 items
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 9 items
Federal Reserve Bank of New York 8 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 6 items
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 4 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 4 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 3 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 2 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 1 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 1 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 1 items
show more (7)
show less
FILTER BY Series
Finance and Economics Discussion Series 11 items
FRBSF Economic Letter 6 items
Working Papers 4 items
Business Review 2 items
Current Issues in Economics and Finance 2 items
Economic Policy Review 2 items
Economic Synopses 2 items
New England Economic Review 2 items
Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 2 items
Policy Hub 2 items
Quarterly Review 2 items
Staff Reports 2 items
The Regional Economist 2 items
Working Paper Series 2 items
Chicago Fed Letter 1 items
Econ Focus 1 items
Economic Commentary 1 items
Economic Perspectives 1 items
Economic Review 1 items
International Finance Discussion Papers 1 items
Liber8 Economic Information Newsletter 1 items
New England Public Policy Center Research Report 1 items
Public Policy Brief 1 items
Research Paper 1 items
Research Working Paper 1 items
Staff Report 1 items
The Region 1 items
Working Paper Series, Regional Economic Issues 1 items
show more (23)
show less
FILTER BY Content Type
Journal Article 26 items
Working Paper 22 items
Report 5 items
Newsletter 2 items
Briefing 1 items
Discussion Paper 1 items
show more (1)
show less
FILTER BY Author
Fuller, David L. 4 items
Larrimore, Jeff 4 items
Mortenson, Jacob 4 items
Ravikumar, B. 4 items
Splinter, David 4 items
Zhang, Yuzhe 4 items
Moorthy, Vivek 3 items
Testa, William A. 3 items
Valletta, Robert G. 3 items
Xie, Zoe 3 items
Arslan, Yavuz 2 items
Davila, Natalie A. 2 items
Degerli, Ahmet 2 items
Fujita, Shigeru 2 items
McElhattan, Rose 2 items
O'Leary, Christopher J. 2 items
Petrosky-Nadeau, Nicolas 2 items
Price, Brendan M. 2 items
Ratner, David 2 items
Sahin, Aysegul 2 items
Tannenwald, Robert 2 items
Abdalla, Khalid 1 items
Aguilar, Linda M. 1 items
Bryan, Michael F. 1 items
Cai, Zhifeng 1 items
Cajner, Tomaz 1 items
Chodorow-Reich, Gabriel 1 items
Cleary, Aisling 1 items
Clement, Douglas 1 items
Coglianese, John M. 1 items
Doniger, Cynthia L. 1 items
El-Ghazaly, Hoda S. 1 items
Fabre, Alice 1 items
Figura, Andrew 1 items
Ghayad, Rand 1 items
Graves, Sebastian 1 items
Guler, Bulent 1 items
Heathcote, Jonathan 1 items
Hobijn, Bart 1 items
Huang, Wei-Jang 1 items
Kabaş, Gazi 1 items
Karabarbounis, Loukas 1 items
Kiley, Michael T. 1 items
Kitao, Sagiri 1 items
Kuang, Katherine 1 items
Kuruscu, Burhanettin 1 items
Kwok, Joyce 1 items
McConnell, Margaret M. 1 items
Michaud, Amanda M. 1 items
Mukoyama, Toshihiko 1 items
Nakajima, Makoto 1 items
Nie, Jun 1 items
Orr, James A. 1 items
Pallage, Stéphane 1 items
Regev, Tali 1 items
Rossana, Robert J. 1 items
Sargent, Timothy C. 1 items
Song, Joseph 1 items
Sporn, John 1 items
Vroman, Wayne 1 items
Weiner, Jennifer 1 items
Weingarden, Alison E. 1 items
Wolcott, Erin 1 items
Wright, Randall 1 items
Zimmermann, Christian 1 items
Şahin, Ayşegül 1 items
show more (61)
show less
FILTER BY Jel Classification
J65 15 items
E24 13 items
J64 8 items
J30 5 items
D31 4 items
E32 4 items
H53 4 items
E62 2 items
H72 2 items
J20 2 items
D10 1 items
D14 1 items
D42 1 items
D62 1 items
D7 1 items
D83 1 items
E10 1 items
E21 1 items
E44 1 items
E60 1 items
G20 1 items
G21 1 items
G51 1 items
H23 1 items
J31 1 items
J42 1 items
J63 1 items
J78 1 items
show more (23)
show less
FILTER BY Keywords
Unemployment insurance 57 items
Unemployment 19 items
Labor market 8 items
COVID-19 8 items
Countercyclical policy 4 items
Stimulus checks 4 items
Earnings 3 items
Government transfers 3 items
Labor supply 3 items
Recessions 3 items
Wages 3 items
Canada 2 items
Economic development 2 items
Employment 2 items
Fiscal policy 2 items
New England 2 items
: COVID-19 1 items
Automatic stabilizers 1 items
Bank funding 1 items
Bank lending 1 items
Business cycle 1 items
Business cycles 1 items
CARES Act 1 items
Connecticut 1 items
Demography 1 items
Directed search 1 items
Economic conditions 1 items
Economic indicators 1 items
Emergency unemployment benefits 1 items
Employment (Economic theory) 1 items
Equilibrium (Economics) 1 items
Federal Reserve District, 2nd 1 items
Forecasting 1 items
Foreclosures 1 items
Fraud 1 items
Full employment policies 1 items
Government spending policy 1 items
Great Resignation 1 items
Heterogeneous agents 1 items
Household and bank balance sheets 1 items
Household income 1 items
Household labor dynamics 1 items
Housing market 1 items
Idiosyncratic shocks 1 items
Information friction 1 items
Job acceptance 1 items
Job loss 1 items
Labor 1 items
Labor protections 1 items
Liquidity (Economics) 1 items
Massachusetts 1 items
Measurement error 1 items
Medicaid 1 items
Minimum wage 1 items
Monopsony 1 items
Moral hazard 1 items
Mortgage debt 1 items
Quits 1 items
Random search 1 items
Recessions - New England 1 items
Seasonal employment 1 items
Seasonality 1 items
Segregation 1 items
Spillover 1 items
Subsidies 1 items
Taxation 1 items
Unemployment insurance - New England 1 items
Unemployment risk 1 items
Unions 1 items
Universal basic income 1 items
Wage earnings 1 items
Wage inequality 1 items
Wage posting 1 items
Worker bargaining power 1 items
experience rating 1 items
heterogeneous agent model 1 items
liquid and illiquid assets 1 items
precautionary savings 1 items
search and matching models 1 items
state finances 1 items
show more (76)
show less