Search Results
Journal Article
How Much Consumption Responds to Government Stimulus
Karabarbounis, Marios; Mehkari, M. Saif; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2018)
What is the effect of government spending on private consumption? Estimates show that stimulus distributed through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act had a large positive effect. Estimates from regional data suggest every $100 of stimulus generated an additional $18 within regions. Furthermore, by accounting for economic connections that spread the impact beyond regional borders, a new study finds that every $100 triggered an increase of $40 in overall private consumption in the economy.
FRBSF Economic Letter
Journal Article
A closer look at the decline in the labor force participation rate
Canon, Maria E.; Debbaut, Peter; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2013-10)
The labor force participation rate has fallen from over 67 percent in 2000 to almost 63 percent today. Among the reasons are the downward trends in the percentages of women and young people in the labor force.
The Regional Economist
, Issue October
Briefing
Deterring default: why some state laws decrease the probability of mortgage foreclosures
Ghent, Andra C.; Slivinski, Stephen; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2009-09)
Many states give mortgage lenders strong legal means by which to pursue debt collection in the event of a mortgage default. In those states, probability of default is lower and the forms the default takes are often quite different from a costly conventional foreclosure.
Richmond Fed Economic Brief
, Issue Sep
Journal Article
How Much Has Job Matching Efficiency Declined?
Hornstein, Andreas; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2017)
During the recession and recovery, hiring has been slower than might be expected considering the large numbers of vacant jobs and unemployed individuals. This raises some concern about structural changes in the process of matching job seekers with employers. However, the standard measures account for only the unemployed and not those who are out of the labor force. Including other non-employed groups in the measured pool of job seekers while adjusting for different job finding rates among these groups shows that the decline in matching efficiency is similar to earlier declines.
FRBSF Economic Letter
Working Paper
Generalized Matching Functions and Resource Utilization Indices for the Labor Market
Hornstein, Andreas; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2017-02-15)
In the U.S. labor market unemployed individuals that are actively looking for work are more than three times as likely to become employed as those individuals that are not actively looking for work and are considered to be out of the labor force (OLF). Yet, on average, every month twice as many people make the transition from OLF to employment than do from unemployment. Based on these observations we have argued in Hornstein, Kudlyak, and Lange (2014) for an alternative measure of resource utilization in the labor market, a non-employment index, which is more comprehensive than the standard ...
Working Paper Series
, Paper 2017-5
Journal Article
Assessing the Recent Rise in Unemployment
Avaradi, Greeshma; Miskanic, Brandon E.; Wiczer, David; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2025-04-14)
The unemployment rate has risen over half a percentage point since the second quarter of 2023. Individual survey data underlying the unemployment rate can help in assessing which labor market transitions account for this rise. One dominant factor appears to be a fall in the job-finding rate—the share of unemployed individuals finding employment. The duration of unemployment has also increased recently. In past decades, these patterns have frequently occurred during the onset of recessions, which suggests that these data should be closely monitored.
FRBSF Economic Letter
, Volume 2025
, Issue 09
, Pages 6
Working Paper
Trends in Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, 1976-2024
Hornstein, Andreas; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2026-05-08)
Using CPS microdata, 1976-2024, we estimate trend and cyclical components of unemployment and labor force participation for 44 age-gender-education groups. We fit a parsimonious state-space model in which each series is the sum of latent cohort and time-varying age effects and a latent cyclical factor shared across unemployment and participation, without imposing structural covariates. Aggregating group trends with observed population shares, we find that population aging and educational upgrading explain most long-run movements in aggregate trends, while cohort effects drive large gender ...
Working Paper Series
, Paper 2026-11
Working Paper
How Cyclical Is the User Cost of Labor?
Kudlyak, Marianna
(2024-03-31)
In employment relationships, a wage is an installment payment on an implicit long-term agreement between a worker and a firm. The price of labor that impacts firm’s hiring decisions, instead, reflects the hiring wage as well as the impact of economic conditions at the time of hiring on future wages. Measured by the labor’s user cost, the price of labor is substantially more pro-cyclical than the new-hire wage or the average wage. The strong procyclicality of the price of labor calls for other forces for cyclical labor demand to explain employment fluctuations.
Working Paper Series
, Paper 2024-10
Working Paper
Regional Consumption Responses and the Aggregate Fiscal Multiplier
Karabarbounis, Marios; Dupor, Bill; Mehkari, M. Saif; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2022-02-03)
We use regional variation in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009-2012) to analyze the effect of government spending on consumer spending. Our consumption data come from household-level retail purchases in the Nielsen scanner data and auto purchases from Equifax credit balances. We estimate that a $1 increase in county-level government spending increases local non-durable consumer spending by $0.29 and local auto spending by $0.09. We translate the regional consumption responses to an aggregate fiscal multiplier using a multi-region, New Keynesian model with heterogeneous agents, ...
Working Papers
, Paper 2018-004
Working Paper
Measuring Heterogeneity in Job Finding Rates Among the Nonemployed Using Labor Force Status Histories
Lange, Fabian; Kudlyak, Marianna
(2014-12-04)
We use a novel approach to studying the heterogeneity in the job finding rates of the nonemployed by classifying the nonemployed by labor force status (LFS) histories, instead of using only one-month LFS. Job finding rates differ substantially across LFS histories: they are 25-30% among those currently out of the labor force (OLF) with recent employment, 10% among those currently OLF who have been unemployed but not employed in the previous two months, and 2% among those who have been OLF in all three previous months. This heterogeneity cannot be deduced from the one-month LFS or from ...
Working Paper
, Paper 14-18
FILTER BY year
FILTER BY Bank
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 45 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 37 items
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 10 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 2 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 1 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 1 items
show more (1)
show less
FILTER BY Series
Working Paper Series 25 items
FRBSF Economic Letter 20 items
Working Paper 16 items
Richmond Fed Economic Brief 13 items
Economic Quarterly 8 items
The Regional Economist 6 items
Working Papers 6 items
Economic Perspectives 1 items
Research Working Paper 1 items
show more (4)
show less
FILTER BY Content Type
FILTER BY Author
Hornstein, Andreas 19 items
Canon, Maria E. 7 items
Hall, Robert E. 7 items
Karabarbounis, Marios 7 items
Mehkari, M. Saif 7 items
Dupor, Bill 6 items
Ghent, Andra C. 6 items
Sanchez, Juan M. 5 items
Lange, Fabian 4 items
Miskanic, Brandon E. 4 items
Mondragon, John 4 items
Ochse, Mitchell 4 items
Reed, Marisa 4 items
Tasci, Murat 4 items
Tuzemen, Didem 4 items
Avaradi, Greeshma 3 items
Debbaut, Peter 3 items
Faberman, R. Jason 3 items
Price, David A. 3 items
Benetton, Matteo 2 items
Coibion, Olivier 2 items
Gorea, Denis 2 items
Gorodnichenko, Yuriy 2 items
Kim, Taerin 2 items
Kryvtsov, Oleksiy 2 items
Lkhagvasuren, Damba 2 items
Lubik, Thomas A. 2 items
Romero, Jessica Sackett 2 items
Slivinski, Stephen 2 items
Wolcott, Erin 2 items
Bennedsen, Morten 1 items
Bertheau, Antoine 1 items
Bils, Mark 1 items
Chen, Ingrid 1 items
Faia, Ester 1 items
Fessenden, Helen 1 items
Fuller, David L. 1 items
Hale, Galina 1 items
Kmetz, Augustus 1 items
Kouchekinia, Noah 1 items
Krishnamurthy, Arvind 1 items
Larsen, Birthe 1 items
Lins, Paulo 1 items
Liu, Louis 1 items
Luo, Guannan 1 items
Meisenbacher, Brigid C. 1 items
Mikhlin, Riva 1 items
Mullin, John 1 items
Ramachandran, David 1 items
Reilly, Devin 1 items
Rhodes, Karl 1 items
Sablik, Timothy 1 items
Schwartzman, Felipe 1 items
Schweinert, Annemarie 1 items
Shabalina, Ekaterina 1 items
Shultz, Patrick 1 items
Sysuyev, Roman 1 items
Tompkins, Jonathan 1 items
Wiczer, David 1 items
show more (55)
show less
FILTER BY Jel Classification
J63 20 items
E32 19 items
J64 19 items
E24 18 items
E21 11 items
J30 8 items
J41 7 items
E51 5 items
E62 5 items
H31 5 items
H71 5 items
D14 4 items
E52 4 items
J11 3 items
J24 3 items
J31 3 items
D31 2 items
G10 2 items
G21 2 items
J21 2 items
J23 2 items
J62 2 items
D22 1 items
D64 1 items
G5 1 items
G51 1 items
J22 1 items
R21 1 items
R31 1 items
show more (24)
show less
FILTER BY Keywords
unemployment 14 items
Labor market 10 items
Unemployment 9 items
Business cycles 6 items
Consumer Spending 5 items
Fiscal Multiplier 5 items
Heterogeneous Agents 5 items
Regional Variation 5 items
covid19 5 items
Business cycle 4 items
Hiring 4 items
Minimum Wage 4 items
Recession 4 items
Recovery 4 items
Search and Matching 4 items
Vacancies 4 items
pandemic 4 items
Age Effects 3 items
Demographic Composition 3 items
labor markets 3 items
monetary policy 3 items
temporary layoffs 3 items
wage rigidity 3 items
Mortgage loans 2 items
Recessions 2 items
cyclicality 2 items
employment 2 items
house prices 2 items
inequality 2 items
labor force 2 items
labor force participation 2 items
layoffs 2 items
mortgages 2 items
recessions 2 items
unemployment rate 2 items
unemployment rates 2 items
wages 2 items
Access to Credit 1 items
Cohort Effects 1 items
Consumer Finance 1 items
Consumer finance 1 items
Credit Cards 1 items
Credit Constraints 1 items
Demography 1 items
Discrete Choice Optimization 1 items
Educational Attainment. 1 items
Employment 1 items
Financial Markets 1 items
Financial Regulation 1 items
Financial institutions 1 items
Great Recession 1 items
Household Finance 1 items
Income Inequality 1 items
Income and Wealth Inequality 1 items
Intergenerational Mobility 1 items
Job applications 1 items
Job search 1 items
Labor Force Participation 1 items
Labor Force Participation Rate 1 items
Labor force participation rate 1 items
Labor supply 1 items
Layoffs 1 items
Leverage 1 items
Monetary policy 1 items
NAIRU 1 items
Occupational Mobility 1 items
Propagation of Shocks 1 items
Recall 1 items
Skills 1 items
Small and Large firms 1 items
Unemployment Rate 1 items
Unemployment Rates 1 items
User Cost of Labor 1 items
Wages 1 items
Women 1 items
anchor 1 items
business cycles 1 items
children 1 items
cohort effects 1 items
consumers 1 items
covid-19 1 items
credit constraints 1 items
cyclical recoveries 1 items
demographic groups 1 items
firms 1 items
full employment 1 items
gender 1 items
heterogeneous agents 1 items
historical patterns 1 items
home equity 1 items
house sales 1 items
household debt 1 items
household finance 1 items
housing 1 items
housing wealth 1 items
inflation 1 items
intergenerational wealth 1 items
job finding 1 items
job separation rate 1 items
job vacancies 1 items
job-finding rates 1 items
labor force participation rate 1 items
labor market conditions 1 items
labor market health 1 items
labor market search effort 1 items
labor market transitions 1 items
lfp 1 items
monetary policy transmission 1 items
natural rate of unemployment 1 items
nonemployment index 1 items
out of the labor force 1 items
parents 1 items
public perceptions 1 items
recoveries 1 items
recovery 1 items
search duration 1 items
survey data 1 items
utilization 1 items
vacancies 1 items
vacancy-to-unemployment ratio 1 items
women 1 items
show more (116)
show less