Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:Carey, Mark S. 

Working Paper
Short Selling and Bank Deposit Flows

Some observers have argued that the short selling of bank stock contributes to bank runs and bank failures. Previously, no evidence has been available. We find no evidence that more short selling of bank stock is associated with materially larger outflows of bank deposits. We believe this means that proposals to restrict the short selling of bank stock should be supported by other arguments.
Working Papers , Paper 24-05

Working Paper
Parameterizing credit risk models with rating data

Estimates of average default probabilities for borrowers assigned to each of a financial institution's internal credit risk rating grades are crucial inputs to portfolio credit risk models. Such models are increasingly used in setting financial institution capital structure, in internal control and compensation systems, in asset-backed security design, and are being considered for use in setting regulatory capital requirements for banks. This paper empirically examines properties of the major methods currently used to estimate average default probabilities by grade. Evidence of potential ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 2000-47

Working Paper
Partial market value accounting, bank capital, volatility, and bank risk

Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 94-21

Working Paper
The Bank as Grim Reaper : Debt Composition and Bankruptcy Thresholds

We offer a model and evidence that private debtholders play a key role in setting the endogenous asset value threshold below which corporations declare bankruptcy. The model, in the spirit of Black and Cox (1976), implies that the recovery rate at emergence from bankruptcy on all of the firm's debt taken together is increasing in the pre-bankruptcy share of private debt in all debt. Empirical evidence supports this and other implications of the model. Indeed, debt composition has a more economically material empirical influence on recovery than all other variables we try taken together.
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 2016-069

Working Paper
Does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ? Evidence on specialization in private debt contracting

This paper establishes empirically that specialization in private-market corporate lending exists, adding a new dimension to the public vs. private debt distinctions now common in the literature on debt contracting and financial intermediation. Using a large database of individual loans, we compare lending by finance companies to that by banks. The evidence implies that it is intermediaries in general that are special in solving information problems, not banks in particular. But lending by the two types of institutions is not identical. Finance companies tend to serve observably riskier ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 96-25

Working Paper
Dimensions of credit risk and their relationship to economic capital requirements

Now in prospect is a major revision of international bank capital regulations that would embody recent advances in credit risk measurement and management. Previous regulations have been simpler in structure, with a primary goal of getting capital requirements right on average, and thus have largely ignored the difference between average and marginal. This paper presents evidence that explicit treatment in new regulations of several important dimensions of credit risk is necessary to limit banks' incentives to engage in capital arbitrage activities. Such activities, if unchecked, may lead to ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 2000-18

Working Paper
Is the corporate loan market globally integrated? a pricing puzzle

We offer evidence that interest rate spreads on syndicated loans to corporate borrowers are economically significantly smaller in Europe than in the U.S., other things equal. Differences in borrower, loan and lender characteristics associated with equilibrium mechanisms suggested in the literature do not appear to explain the phenomenon. Borrowers overwhelmingly issue in their natural home market and bank portfolios display significant home "bias." This may explain why pricing discrepancies are not competed away, but the fundamental causes of the discrepancies remain a puzzle. Thus, ...
International Finance Discussion Papers , Paper 813

Working Paper
Risk Choices and Compensation Design

We analyze the impact of bad-tail risks on managerial pay functions, especially the decision to pay managers in stock or in options. In contrast to conventional wisdom, we find that options are often a superior vehicle for limiting managerial incentives to take bad-tail risks while providing incentives to exert effort. Arrangements similar to collar options are able to incent the desired project choice in wider range of circumstances than call options or stock. However, information requirements appear high. We briefly explore alternatives with features similar to maluses and clawbacks, which ...
International Finance Discussion Papers , Paper 1130

Working Paper
A guide to choosing absolute bank capital requirements

Resampling implementation of a stress-scenario approach to estimating portfolio default loss distributions is proposed as the basis for estimates of the appropriate absolute level of economic capital allocations for portfolio credit risk. Estimates are presented for stress scenarios of varying severity. Implications of use of different analysis time horizons are analyzed. Results for a numeraire portfolio are quite sensitive to such variations. Although the analysis is framed in terms of recent proposals to revise regulatory capital requirements for banks, the arguments and results are also ...
International Finance Discussion Papers , Paper 726

Working Paper
Revenge of the steamroller: ABCP as a window on risk choices

We empirically examine financial institutions' motivations to take systematic bad-tail risk in the form of sponsorship of credit-arbitrage asset-backed commercial paper vehicles. A run on debt issued by such vehicles played a key role in causing and propagating the liquidity crisis that began in the summer of 2007. We find evidence consistent with important roles for both owner-manager agency problems and government-induced distortions, especially government control or ownership of banks.
International Finance Discussion Papers , Paper 1076

FILTER BY YEAR

FILTER BY CONTENT TYPE

FILTER BY JEL CLASSIFICATION

G12 2 items

G21 2 items

D86 1 items

G01 1 items

G18 1 items

G20 1 items

show more (4)

PREVIOUS / NEXT