Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Working Papers
Should the Fed regularly evaluate its monetary policy framework?
Jeffrey C. Fuhrer
Giovanni P. Olivei
Eric S. Rosengren
Geoffrey M. B. Tootell
Abstract

Would a more open and regular evaluation of the monetary policy framework improve policy in the United States? Even when considering a relatively short timeframe that spans the 1960s to the present, it is possible to point to many significant changes to the framework. Some of the changes were precipitated by acute economic conditions, while others were considered and implemented only gradually as a response to long-standing problems with the framework. But the process for evaluating and changing frameworks to date has not always been transparent, and changes have not always been timely. Could a more formal, and open, review improve how well we adhere to our current framework? Could transitions to a new framework be made more effectively? We conclude that such a review might indeed be beneficial, and outline one possible review process.


Download Summary
Download Full text
Cite this item
Jeffrey C. Fuhrer & Giovanni P. Olivei & Eric S. Rosengren & Geoffrey M. B. Tootell, Should the Fed regularly evaluate its monetary policy framework?, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Working Papers 18-8, 01 Oct 2018.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: monetary policy framework; the evolution of monetary policy; FOMC; policy rules
For corrections, contact Catherine Spozio ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal